Osteonecrose dos maxilares relacionada ao uso demedicamentos: características patológicas, diagnóstico,prevenção e estratégias terapêuticas / Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: pathological characteristics, diagnosis, prevention and therapeutic strategies

Objetivo: Este trabalho tem como propósito fornecer uma análise abrangente das características clínicas, etiológicas, radiográficas e histopatológicas da osteonecrose dos maxilares relacionada ao uso de medicamentos, além de abordar os métodos de diagnóstico, prevenção e estratégias terapêuticas. Materiais e métodos: foi realizada uma busca por artigos científicos publicados no período de 2015 a 2023, utilizando as bases de dados Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) e ScienceDirect. Conclusão: Embora infrequente, há um considerável potencial de ocorrência de osteonecrose dos maxilares em pacientes submetidos a terapia prolongada com medicamentos antirreabsortivos e antiangiogênicos, especialmente quando não são adotadas medidas preventivas adequadas. A implementação de práticas preventivas, a vigilância das condições bucais e a colaboração de uma equipe multidisciplinar são fundamentais para reduzir os riscos associados a essa condição patológica.(AU)

Objective: This work aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the clinical, etiological, radiographic and histopathological characteristics of Medication-Related Jaw Osteonecrosis, in addition to addressing diagnostic methods, prevention and therapeutic strategies. Materials and methods: A search was carried out for scientific articles published between 2015 and 2023, using the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), US National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and ScienceDirect databases. Conclusion: Although infrequent, there is a considerable potential for osteonecrosis of the jaw to occur in patients undergoing prolonged therapy with antiresorptive and antiangiogenic medications, especially when adequate preventive measures are not adopted. The implementation of preventive practices, surveillance of oral conditions and the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team are essential to reduce the risks associated with this pathological condition.(AU)

Osteonecrosis maxilar asociada con altas dosis de antirresortivos en paciente oncolólgico adulto mayor: resolución interdisciplinaria de caso clínico / Osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with high doses of antiresorptive in an elderly cancer patient: interdisciplinary resolution of a clinical case

La osteonecrosis maxilar relacionada con medicamentos (ONMM) es una patología de características clínicas objetivas con signo-sintomatología patogno-mónica. El criterio clínico aceptado es la presencia de hueso necrótico expuesto y visible sobre el reborde óseo maxilar que no ha cicatrizado luego de 8 sema-nas, en pacientes con antecedentes de tratamiento antirresortivo. La denominación relacionada con medicamentos se utiliza por el creciente número de casos asociados con otros fármacos antirresortivos como denosumab y con terapias antiangiogénicas, más allá de la conocida relación con bifosfonatos. Si bien la incidencia de ONMM en pacientes tratados por osteopatías metabólicas es muy baja, la situa-ción se torna más compleja en pacientes oncológicos con altas dosis de antirresortivos para tratamiento de metástasis ósea. Varios informes de casos des-criben cuadros de ONMM en pacientes con cáncer que reciben terapias dirigidas, específicamente TKI (inhibidores de tirosina kinasa) y anticuerpos mo-noclonales-VEGF (anticuerpos dirigidos al factor de crecimiento del endotelio vascular). La ONMM afecta negativamente la calidad de vida del paciente onco-lógico y produce comorbilidad significativa. Resulta imperioso identificar los pacientes en riesgo y dise-ñar un protocolo de atención odontológica específico para estos casos. En este artículo, se presenta un caso de ONMM asociado con altas dosis de Deno-sumab y administración simultánea de anticuerpos monoclonales específicos. El caso sorprende por la magnitud de la necrosis y su cuadro insidioso. El pro-tocolo de tratamiento descripto permitió controlar el cuadro inicial, limitar el avance de la lesión, asegurar el control del dolor y la infección, y finalmente, la cu-ración total de la lesión (AU)

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a pathology with objective clinical characteristics with pathognomonic signs and symp-toms. The accepted clinical criterion is the presence of exposed and visible necrotic bone on the maxillofacial region that has not healed after 8 weeks, in patients with history of antiresorptive treatment. The name medication-related is justified by the growing number of cases associated with other antiresorptive drugs such as denosumab and antiangiogenic therapies, beyond the known relationship with bisphosphonates. Although the incidence of MRONJ in patients treated for metabolic osteopathies is very low, the situation becomes more complex in cancer patients who re-ceive high doses of antiresorptives for the treatment of skeletal metastases. Several case reports describe the presence of MRONJ in cancer patients receiving targeted therapies, specifically TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) and monoclonal antibodies-targeting VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor). MRONJ nega-tively affects the quality of life in cancer patients and produces significant comorbidity. It is imperative to identify patients at risk and design a specific den-tal care strategy for these cases. In this article, we present a case of MRONJ associated with high doses of Denosumab and simultaneous administration of specific monoclonal antibodies. The case is surpris-ing due to magnitude of the necrosis. The described treatment strategies made it possible to control the initial symptoms, limit the lesion progression, ensure pain and infection control, and finally, the total heal-ing of the lesion (AU)

Osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociada a drogas antirresortivas en pacientes osteoporóticos: presentación de un caso clínico / Antiresorptive drugs-related jaw osteonecrosis in osteoporotic patients: report of a clinical case

La osteoporosis se caracteriza por una masa ósea baja con deterioro de la microarquitectura del tejido que conduce a la fragilidad, lo que aumenta el riesgo de fracturas. Después de la menopausia, la deficiencia de estrógenos aumenta la exposición del tejido al ligan- do RANK, lo que resulta en un aumento de la reabsorción y pérdida ósea, que pueden provocar osteoporosis. (1) Los bifosfonatos y el denosumab son utilizados para el tratamiento de la osteoporosis debido a su capacidad anticatabólica, que reducen la remodelación previniendo la pérdida de masa ósea, disminuyendo la probabilidad de fracturas y aumentando la densidad mineral del tejido. (2) La osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociadas a drogas antirresortivas es una situación que se presenta en pacientes que consumen de manera crónica antirresortivos para el tratamiento de enfermedades como: osteoporosis, osteogénesis imperfecta, enfermedad de Paget, displasia fi- brosa, hipercalcemia maligna asociada a tratamiento oncológico (AU)

Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass with deterioration of the tissue microarchitec- ture leading to fragility, which increases the risk of fractures. After menopause, estrogen deficiency increases tissue exposure to the RANK ligand, resulting in increased bone loss and resorption, which can lead to osteoporosis. (1) Bisphosphonates and denosumab are used for the treatment in low concentration, due to their anticatabolic capacity, which reduce remodeling, preventing loss of bone mass and fractures besides, antiresorptives drugs increase the mineral density of the tissue. (2) Osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with antiresorptives drugs occurs in patients whose chro- nically consume these drugs for the treatment of diseases such as: osteoporosis, imperfect osteogenesis, Paget's disease, fibrous dysplasia, malignant hypercalcemia associated with oncological treatment (AU)

Denosumab como tratamiento neoadyuvante del tumor de células gigantes del hueso. Indicaciones, resultados y efectos adversos / Denosumab as a neoadjuvant treatment for giant cell tumor of bone. Indications, results and side effects

Resumen El tumor de células gigantes óseo es una neoplasia de agresividad local intermedia, que raramente metastatiza. En los últimos años el denosumab, anticuerpo monoclonal humano, surgió como una alternativa de tratamiento para esta enfermedad, al bloquear el comportamiento lítico tumoral. El objetivo de este trabajo fue determinar sus indicaciones y efectos adversos, analizando también los resultados oncológicos, y las tasas de recurrencia local en pacientes con diagnóstico de tumor de células gigantes óseo que recibieron denosumab como tratamiento neoadyuvante. Entre 2010 y 2018 se analizaron 80 pacientes con tumor de células gigantes, de los cuales 14 recibieron denosumab como tratamiento neoadyuvante. El seguimiento mínimo fue 12 meses. En 8 pacientes se trató de un tumor primario, mientras que 6 fueron pacientes con recidiva tumoral. En todos los casos se evidenció una mejoría clínica. Trece presentaron cambios radiográficos, y 11 respuesta histológica completa. En 6 de 14 pacientes se evidenció una recurrencia local y en 7 se identificó al menos un efecto adverso relacionado con el denosumab (incluyendo una malignización tumoral). A pesar de ser una herramienta útil para el tratamiento del tumor de células gigantes, el uso de denosumab está asociado a mayor tasa de recurrencias locales y no está exento de efectos adversos.

Abstract Giant cell tumor of bone is an intermediate, locally aggressive and rarely metastasiz ing, primary bone neoplasia. In recent years denosumab emerged as a treatment alternative for this pathology. The objective of this work was to analyze its indications as well as the clinical outcomes, side effects and local recurrence rates in patients diagnosed with giant cell tumor of bone, who received denosumab as neoadjuvant treatment. Between 2010 and 2018, 80 patients with giant cell tumor were analyzed, of whom 14 received deno sumab as a neoadjuvant treatment. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. In 8 patients it was a primary tumor, while 6 showed tumor recurrence. In all cases, clinical improvement was evident. Thirteen patients presented radiographic changes, and 11 showed complete histological response. A local recurrence was evidenced in 6 of 14 patients, and at least one adverse effect related to denosumab (including tumor malignancy) was identified in 7. Despite being a useful tool for treating giant cell tumor, the use of denosumab is associated with a higher rate of local recurrences and is not free of adverse effects.

Osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociada a medicamentos: revisión de la literatura y propuesta para la prevención y manejo / Osteonecrosis of the jaws

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw is a disease where there is necrotic bone exposed or that can be explored by means of a fistula in the maxillofacial region. It has been associated with the use Biphosphonates and denosumab for osteoporosis. Although its etiology is unclear, it may be related to a decrease in bone turnover produced by these drugs, rendering the bone more prone to generate cell necrosis during invasive dental procedures, especially in the posterior region of the jaw. There is no consensus about the prevention and treatment of this condition. The aim of this paper is to present a review of the literature with the main characteristics of osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with drugs, together with a proposal for prevention and treatment for these patients.

Eficácia e segurança do denosumabe comparado aos bifosfonados orais para tratamento de osteoporose e prevenção de fraturas: revisão rápida de evidências / Effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of denosumab compared to oral biposphonates for treating osteoporosis and fracture prevention: rapid review of evidence

Tecnologia: Denosumabe e bifosfonados. Indicação: tratamento de osteoporose para prevenção de fraturas. Pergunta: O denosumabe é mais eficaz e seguro que os bifosfonados orais para tratamento da osteoporose e prevenção de fraturas secundárias à osteoporose? Métodos: Levantamento bibliográfico realizado na PUBMED seguindo estratégia de busca predefinida. Avaliação da qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas com a ferramenta AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Resultados: Foram selecionadas e incluídas 3 revisões sistemáticas, com pontuação de 9 a 11 no AMSTAR. Conclusão: Denosumabe tem menor risco relativo que alendronato e risedronato de sódio para fraturas vertebrais e maior efeito sobre densidade óssea mineral femoral, com risco similar de outros tipos de fratura e eventos adversos (infecções, transtornos cardiovasculares, óbito por infecção, morte cardiovascular ou por qualquer causa). Denosumabe evita 0,00154 fraturas, previne 0,00025 institucionalizações (ou cuidados permanentes de enfermagem no domicílio) e promove um ganho de 0,0018 anos de vida a mais que o alendronato de sódio por paciente tratado. Denosumabe é um pouco mais eficaz e tão seguro quanto os bifosfonados, mas a diferença de eficácia é mínima

Technology: Denosumab and bisphosphonates. Indication: osteoporosis treatment for fracture prevention. Question: Denosumab is more effective and safer than oral bisphosphonates for treating osteoporosis and preventing fractures related to osteoporosis? Methods: Bibliographic search was performed on PUBMED, following predefined search strategies. Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews was carried out using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool. Results: We selected and included 3 systematic reviews. Their scores ranged from 9 to 11 on AMSTAR. Conclusion: Denosumab has a lower relative risk than sodium alendronate and risedronate for vertebral fractures and greater effect on femoral mineral bone density, with a similar risk for non-vertebral fractures and adverse events (infections, cardiovascular disorders, death caused by infection, cardiovascular death or any cause mortality). Denosumab avoids 0.00154 fractures, prevents 0.00025 nursing home/ residential care admissions and get 0.0018 years of life gained per treated patient more than sodium alendronate. Denosumab is slightly more effective and as safe as bisphosphonates, but the effectiveness difference is minimal

Osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociada a medicamentos (ONMM): guía redactada por expertos invitados por la Asociación Argentina de Osteología y Metabolismo Mineral y por la Sociedad Argentina de Osteoporosis / Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): guideline prepared by experts invited by the Argentine Association of Osteology and Mineral Metabolism, and the Argentine Society for Osteoporosis

La osteonecrosis maxilar asociada a medicamentos (ONMM=MRONJ como se conoce en la literatura en inglés) se define como un área ósea expuesta al medio bucal con más de ocho semanas de permanencia, en pacientes tratados con antirresortivos y/o antiangiogénicos y sin antecedentes de radioterapia en cabeza y cuello. Las fracturas ocasionan una morbimortalidad significativa y los antirresortivos son drogas eficaces y seguras para prevenirlas. Se utilizan principalmente en osteoporosis, pero también en enfermedades oncológicas como mieloma múltiple o metástasis óseas de tumores sólidos. La posología varía según el contexto clínico, siendo mayor la dosis y frecuencia de administración en oncología. Los antirresortivos actualmente más utilizados son los bifosfonatos (BF) y el denosumab (Dmab). Si bien los BF persisten largo tiempo en el tejido óseo, el Dmab tiene un mecanismo de acción reversible y su suspensión abrupta conlleva importante pérdida de masa ósea y riesgo aumentado de fracturas vertebrales múltiples. Ninguna droga puede ser suspendida ni espaciada sin autorización médica, dado que no es de competencia del odontólogo. El diagnóstico presuntivo de ONMM debe ser confirmado clínicamente por un odontólogo, quien solicitará imágenes radiológicas para establecer el estadio de la lesión. La anamnesis correcta permite establecer un diagnóstico diferencial entre ONMM, osteomielitis y osteorradionecrosis. La presentación clínica es variable y puede mostrar distintos estadios. La mayoría de los casos están precedidos por un procedimiento quirúrgico odontológico. Suele ser asintomática, aunque puede haber dolor si se localiza cerca de una estructura neuronal. La localización es variable: 62,3% se produce en el maxilar inferior. La incidencia de ONMM es baja, en un rango de 0,001 a 0,01% y tiene relación con las dosis y el tiempo de administración. La remoción de caries, la operatoria dental, la endodoncia y la rehabilitación protética fija o removible no se asocian a riesgo de ONMM. Con menos de 3 años de tratamiento antirresortivo se pueden efectuar terapéuticas quirúrgicas como exodoncias, apicectomías, cistectomías, tratamientos periodontales de raspaje y alisado subgingival sin riesgo. Con más de 3 años se aconseja evitar la realización de exodoncias y manipulación de tejido óseo. Ante la necesidad de realizar un procedimiento odontológico, no hay evidencia que avale que la suspensión transitoria del tratamiento antirresortivo pueda reducir el riesgo. Tampoco la medición de marcadores de remodelado óseo aporta datos de utilidad. Existen pocos datos en la literatura sobre la colocación de implantes dentales en pacientes que reciben drogas antirresortivas en dosis bajas; si bien existe ONMM asociada, su incidencia sería baja. Antes de iniciar un tratamiento antirresortivo se recomienda realizar interconsulta con el odontólogo para evaluar potenciales necesidades quirúrgicas. Quienes reciben antirresortivos deben realizar controles orales periódicos (semestrales) y, ante cualquier síntoma compatible con un estadio incipiente de ONMM, deben consultar a su odontólogo. El trabajo conjunto del médico y el odontólogo puede prevenir la aparición de la ONMM, un evento infrecuente, pero que puede generar elevada morbilidad en los pacientes. La comunicación fluida entre profesionales tenderá a evitar no solo la incertidumbre y desconfianza de los pacientes, sino también que se produzcan lesiones con la consecuente necesidad de tratamientos de mayor complejidad. (AU)

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) is defined as a bone area exposed to the oral environment lasting more than eight weeks, in patients treated with antiresorptive and/or antiangiogenic drugs and without a history radiation therapy to the head and neck. Fractures cause significant morbidity and mortality, and antiresorptives are effective and safe drugs to prevent them. They are used to treat not only osteoporosis but also oncological diseases such as multiple myeloma or bone metastases from solid tumors. The dosage varies according to the clinical context; doses and frequencies of administration are higher in oncology. The most commonly used antiresorptive medications are bisphosphonates (BP) and denosumab (Dmab). Whereas BP persist for a long time in bone tissue, Dmab has a reversible mechanism of action and its discontinuation leads to significant loss of bone mass and an increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures. No drug can be suspended or spaced without medical authorization. Dentists should not take decisions about antiresorptive prescription. The presumptive diagnosis of MRONJ must be clinically confirmed by a dentist, who will order radiological studies to establish the stage of the injury. The correct anamnesis helps differentiate MRONJ from osteomyelitis and osteoradionecrosis. Clinical presentation is variable and can present different stages. Most of the cases are preceded by a dental surgical procedure. Usually MRONJ is asymptomatic although patients may feel pain if it is located near a neuronal structure. The location is variable: 62.3% occurs in the lower jaw. The incidence of MRONJ is low, in the range of 0.001 to 0.01%, and is related to the dose and time of administration. Caries removal, dental surgery, endodontics, fixed or removable prosthetic rehabilitation are not associated with risk of MRONJ. With less than 3 years of antiresorptive treatment, surgical therapies such as extractions, apicectomies, cystectomies, periodontal scaling treatments and subgingival smoothing can be performed without risk. With more than 3 years, it is advisable to avoid performing extractions and manipulating bone tissue. Given the need to perform a dental procedure, there is no evidence to support that the temporary suspension of antiresorptive treatment can reduce the risk. Nor does the measurement of bone turnover markers provide useful information. There are few data in the literature on the placement of dental implants in patients receiving antiresorptive drugs at low doses; although there might be an associated risk of MRONJ, its incidence appears to be low. Before starting antiresorptive treatment, consultation with the dentist is recommended to evaluate potential surgical needs. Patients receiving treatment with antiresorptive agents should undergo periodic oral controls (every six months) and in the event of any symptoms compatible with an early MRONJ stage, they should consult their dentists. The collaboration between physician and dentist can prevent the appearance of MRONJ, that is an infrequent event, but can generate high morbidity in patients. Fluid communication between professionals will tend to avoid, not only the uncertainty and distrust of patients, but also the occurrence of injuries needing complex treatments. (AU)

Osteoactivos en insuficiencia renal crónica avanzada: a propósito de un caso / Osteoactive in advanced chronic renal failure: a case report

El propósito de la terapia en el desorden del metabolismo óseo mineral asociado a la enfermedad renal crónica (IRC) consiste en restaurar el balance mineral, y, en la osteoporosis, mantener o aumentar la masa ósea. Ambas terapias tratan de evitar la fractura ósea. La mayoría de los osteoactivos están contraindicados en la insuficiencia renal crónica avanzada (estadios 4 y 5), y las terapias son empíricas. Algunos autores opinan que sin anomalías bioquímicas del desorden del metabolismo óseo mineral asociado a la enfermedad renal crónica avanzada se podría intentar el tratamiento estándar para la osteoporosis. Antes de intentar la terapia osteoactiva se debe corregir el desorden mineral óseo que pudiera presentarse asociado a la IRC, y en la indicación del tipo de osteoactivo se sugiere seleccionar al paciente según su estado óseo. Se aconseja que la administración de los antirresortivos se realice a dosis menores con respecto a los que tienen mejor función renal junto con aportes adecuados de calcio y vitamina D, antes y durante el tratamiento para prevenir el riesgo de severas hipocalcemias y un efecto óseo excesivo. Se presenta el caso clínico de una mujer de 65 años, con diagnóstico de osteoporosis de etiología multifactorial, fractura de pelvis, múltiples fracturas vertebrales e insuficiencia renal crónica avanzada, entre otras comorbilidades, y probable enfermedad ósea adinámica. Recibió inicialmente terapia con teriparatide y luego con denosumab, complicándose con hipocalcemia asintomática. (AU)

The purpose of therapy for the bone mineral metabolism disorder associated with chronic kidney disease is to restore the mineral balance; and to maintain or increase bone mass in osteoporosis. The goal of both types of therapy is to avoid bone fractures. Most antiosteoporotic drugs are contraindicated in advanced chronic renal failure (CRF) stages 4 and 5, and the therapies are empirical. Some authors believe that without biochemical abnormalities of the mineral bone metabolism disorder associated with advanced chronic kidney disease, standard treatment for osteoporosis could be attempted. Before attempting antiosteoporotic therapy, the bone mineral disorder that may be associated with CRF must be corrected, and in the indication of the type drug it is suggested that the patient be selected according to their bone status. It is advised that the administration of anti-resorptives be performed at lower doses in individuals with poor renal function compared to those with better renal function together with adequate calcium and vitamin D, before and during treatment to prevent the risk of severe hypocalcemia, and an excessive bone effect. We present the clinical case of a 65-year-old woman with a diagnosis of osteoporosis of multifactorial etiology, pelvic fracture, multiple vertebral fractures and advanced chronic renal failure, among other comorbidities and probable adynamic bone disease. The patient received initial therapy with teriparatide and followed by denosumab administration and exhibited asymptomatic hypocalcemia. (AU)

Agentes antirresortivos y antiangiogénicos y su relación con la osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociada a medicamentos / Antiresorptive and antiangiogenic agents and their relationship with osteonecrosis of the jaws related to medication

El objetivo de este trabajo es revisar los conocimientos actuales sobre el manejo clínico-odontológico de pacientes que consumen medicamentos antirresortivos y medicamentos antiangiogénicos o quimioterapéuticos, en relación con la prevención y/o el tratamiento de la osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociada a medicamentos. Se evaluaron similitudes y diferencias entre los bifosfonatos, denosumab y medicamentos antiangiogénicos, así como el manejo clínico de pacientes, vacaciones de medicamentos y el manejo de osteonecrosis de los maxilares ya instalada. Se encontraron similitudes en la presentación clínica, la prevención, el uso de antibioticoterapia antes de procedimientos invasivos y el tratamiento de la osteonecrosis ya instalada. Entre las diferencias, podemos mencionar que el tratamiento quirúrgico respondería mejor en pacientes medicados con denosumab o antiangiogénicos, y su suspensión sería más efectiva si se iniciara un proceso de osteonecrosis, al igual que su tasa de resolución. En cuanto a las vacaciones de medicamentos, no hay datos concluyentes para guiar esta decisión, al igual que no existe un protocolo clínico de atención en pacientes que consumen denosumab o antiangiogénicos (AU)

The aim of this study is to review the currents knowledge about the clinical and dental management of patients who consume antiresorptive and antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapeutic drugs, in relation to the prevention and/or treatment of osteonecrosis of the jaws related to medication. Similarities and differences between bisphosphonates, denosumab and antiangiogenic medications were evaluatted, as well as the clinical management of patients, drugs holidays and management of osteonecrosis of the jaws already setted. Similarities were found in the clinical presentation, prevention, use of antibiotic therapy before invasive procedures and the treatment of osteonecrosis already installed. Regarding the differences, we can mention that the surgical treatment would be better in patients medicated with denosumab or antiangiogenics and its suspension would be more effective if an osteonecrosis process is initiated, as well as its resolution rate. There are no conclusive data about drug holidays to guide this decision, and no clinical protocol of care in patients who consume denosumab or antiangiogenic agents (AU)

Fracturas vertebrales múltiples postsuspensión de denosumab: revisión del tema a partir de dos casos clínicos / Discontinuation of denosumab and multiple vertebral fractures: report of two cases and review of the literature

Los tratamientos para osteoporosis se indican por tiempo variable dependiendo del tipo de droga, anabólica o anticatabólica, y de la gravedad de la enfermedad. Denosumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal totalmente humano que inhibe a RANK-L evitando de esa manera la interacción entre RANKL-RANK, con la consiguiente inhibición de la formación de los osteoclastos, su activación y sobrevida. Disminuye la resorción ósea cortical y trabecular. Su administración subcutánea de 60 mg cada 6 meses al cabo de 3 años ha demostrado reducción de la resorción ósea, incremento de la densidad mineral ósea y disminución de las fracturas vertebrales, no vertebrales y de cadera. Está indicado para el tratamiento de la osteoporosis con alto riesgo de fractura. Su mecanismo de acción es reversible. Se han descripto pérdida de la DMO y elevación de los marcadores de remodelado óseo postsuspensión. Una situación clínica grave son las fracturas vertebrales múltiples postsuspensión. Este evento es infrecuente y se lo atribuye a un rebote del remodelado óseo, postulándose se postula una predisposición especial, probablemente relacionada con microRNA. Se escriben dos mujeres con osteoporosis que presentaron este cuadro. Las fracturas ocurrieron entre 7 y 10 meses posteriores a la última dosis de denosumab. Registraron elevación de C-telopéptidos y disminución de la DMO conjuntamente con las fracturas vertebrales agudas en cascada. (AU)

The duration of osteoporosis treatments depends on the drug type, anabolic or anticatabolic, and the severity of the disease. Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inactivates RANK-L, inhibiting the RANKL-RANK interaction . This inhibits osteoclast formation, activation, and survival. It also reduces cortical and trabecular bone resorption. Subcutaneous administration of 60 mg every 6 months for 3 years has reduced bone resorption, increased bone mineral density (BMD) and decreased vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures. It is indicated for the treatment of osteoporosis with high risk of fracture. Denosumab mechanism of action is reversible. After discontinuation, loss of BMD and elevation of bone turnover markers have been observed. In addition, multiple vertebral fractures after the suspension of the drug have been reported. These rebound-associated vertebral fractures are rare. A special genetic predisposition related to miRNA has been proposed. Two women with this clinical presentation are described. Fractures occurred between 7 and 10 months respectively after the last dose of denosumab. They presented with an increase in circulating C-telopeptid levels and a decrease inBMD with acute multiple vertebral fractures. (AU)

Surgery Combined with LPRF in Denosumab Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: Case Report

Abstract This paper describes two cases in which the use of leucocyte-rich and platelet-rich fibrin (LPRF) combined with bone resection did not result in complete tissue response in the treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). It has been recently described in patients receiving subcutaneous administration of RANK-inhibitors, such as Denosumab, and anti-angiogenic drugs, such as Bevacizumab, as observed in our cases. Due to promising results in recent studies, more patients will receive these medications in order to avoid skeletal complications due to metastatic bone disease and, therefore, this scenario has a potential to become a comparable challenge to the bisphosphonate- induced jaw necrosis in the area of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. No convincing surgical technique has been described to overcome the non-healing mucosal lesions with exposed bone due to RANK-inhibitor therapy. Based on the findings in the literature and in both cases described herein can be concluded that the use of LPRF should be considered in the treatment of patients with DRONJ.

Resumo Este artigo descreve dois casos onde a ressecção óssea associada à fibrina rica em plaquetas e leucócitos (LPRF) não resultou em resposta completa no tratamento da osteonecrose dos maxilares relacionados à medicações (MRONJ). Como observado nos casos aqui relatados, MRONJ foi recentemente descrito na literatura em pacientes que recebem a administração subcutânea de inibidores-RANK, como Denosumab ou drogas anti-angiogenicas, como Bevacizumab. Estudos recentes com resultados promissores indicam que mais pacientes serão tratados com estas terapias para evitar complicações esqueléticas devido às metástases ósseas. Portanto, este cenário pode tornar-se um desafio clínico comparável às osteonecroses dos maxilares relacionados aos bisfosfonatos na área de Cirurgia Bucomaxilofacial. Até o momento, nenhuma técnica cirúrgica foi descrita com eficiência para superar as lesões da mucosa com exposição óssea e que não cicatrizam devido a terapia com inibidores de RANK. Com base na literatura e nos achados dos casos reportados, podemos concluir que o uso do LPRF pode ser considerado no tratamento de pacientes com osteonecrose dos maxilares relacionados ao Denosumab.